Loading…

Revelation is unavailable, but you can change that!

Perhaps no book in the entire New Testament has been misinterpreted to the extent of Revelation. The imagery and symbolism—and the entire genre of apocalyptic literature—presents an obstacle to interpretation, and exegetical method must be applied carefully. Gerhard Krodel, in his commentary on Revelation, offers a lengthy synopsis of Revelation’s interpretive history, including the myriad ways...

highly.” Excerpts from Dionysius became widely known, also to Luther (cf. his prefaces), through Eusebius’s History of the Church. The Origenist Eusebius counted the Apocalypse among the “homologoumena,” writings acknowledged by the churches, but he added the comment, “if one wishes.” Simultaneously he counted it also among the spurious, rejected writings, adding the same comment, “if one wishes.” His own preference was clearly for exclusion of this book from the canonical writings of the New Testament.
Page 25